But yeah depsite my complaints my main advice is still WORRY ABOUT YOUR SCRIPTS FIRST - LET THE SCRIPTS DECIDE THE ENGINE I like RMXP for the mapping, but I'm using RMXP for Atoa's Chrono Trigger Battle System. You'd think events-used-as-a-third-layer would be the kind of user-unfriendly thing Enterbrian would try to kill off. But that's annoying, time-consuming, and the kind of confusing system that novices really would have trouble with. I just heavily abused events, treating them like a third layer. I made some decentish maps in RM2K3 with only two layers and far fewer tiles. Since some of my tilesets are already breaking the soft limit in RMXP - 2048 rows of tiles in a single tileset is where the scroll bar stops functioning, but you can have more, you just have to use the arrow keys past that point - I really can't even imagine how I'd be able to put up with losing the third layer and also being limited to only 288 rows of tiles, and more than half of those being forced to be lower layer only.I'm exaggerating the problem a little I guess. Since instead of just one candle tile, I'd need like twenty candle tiles, each on top of a different desk/table or a different section of a desk/table. I could live without a third layer I would just need about three times as many tiles per tileset. Because many scripts have only been made for one engine or the other. And then use whichever RPG Maker those scripts are for.
#Rpg maker vx ace download tilesets comercial only code#
Figure out what features you need that you aren't willing to code yourself, and then find scripts that do those things. In the end my advice is always to decide the details of your game first. Both of these downsides are surpassable if you're comfortable with scripting then the comparatively crappy event commands in XP don't matter, and if you're comfortable with photoshopping then the comparatively crappy mapping in VX Ace doesn't matter. VX Ace took a more streamlined, user-friendly approach to the entire engine that most people generally appreciate, but XP's ability to make more complex maps was sacrificed as a casualty. The main difference between XP and Ace is that XP has much more powerful mapping (three layers instead of two, infinite tilesets of infinite size) but VX Ace is much more friendly with its events (it has many event commands and options that XP is missing). VX is probably not even worth considering, as it's worse than VX Ace in every way except for the price. I should be able to find scripts and such to accomplish what I need to in either program. I've noticed there are a ton of resources for both XP and the VX programs, so not sure there is much of a difference there. My question is, what are the differences of these? Are they actually better than XP? Most of my experience was with RM2K and RM2K3, and I remember feeling a bit lost with RMXP with certain things. I was surprised to see that there are actually two new engines added to the list, VX and VX Ace. Either way, I decided to see what was new these days, and came back to the RMN site. I purchased a copy of RPG Maker XP when it came to the states, but lost all my info tied to the purchase, and licensing information(it may just be buried on HD, I'll have to look more).
I was around during the earliest translations of RM2K and then RM2K3, and left the scene shortly after RPG Maker XP was released.
Hello RMN community! It's been many years since I've used any of the RPG Maker Programs.
0 kommentar(er)
